Prison Legal Services of Michigan, Inc.

   
Home
Self-Help
Cain v. MDOC
MDOC Policies
Volunteering
Links
Contact PLSM
PLSM, Inc. is a non-profit organization that relies on donations to remain active.

Click here to learn how to donate.

free hit counter
hit counter code

 

 
Welcome to PLSM, Inc. Online

PLSM, Inc. is dedicated to providing the inmates of the Michigan Department of Corrections (MDOC) with advice for dealing with legal issues and materials with which they may aid themselves.  In the future, we hope to provide a great deal of information through this website for family members and attorneys assisting prisoners.

In November 2003, PLSM, Inc. settled with the MDOC in the trial Cain et al v. MDOC, which spanned more than 15 years and began with the issues regarding prisoners personal property.  The case eventually encompassed issues including prisoner access to the courts, possession of typewriters, and classification.   PLSM, Inc. represented all the male prisoners in the class.  The final ruling in the case, ordered that PLSM, Inc. be funded for a minimum of two more years to monitor the implementation of the settlement provisions.  Find out more about the progression of that trial by reading the Dear Cain Plaintiffs newsletters available here.

If you cannot find the answers to your questions on this website, please send your question to questions@plsminc.org 




Please Pardon the Dust!

June 4, 2008

Please bear with us while the website undergoes a much needed update. To date, all of the links as well as the contact information have been updated. Feel free to contact us with any questions regarding the site or ideas you may have for it. With these concerns, please contact webmaster@plsminc.org. Remember to stop back soon to see the changes we have made. Thank you!


From the Latest Dear Cain Plaintiffs

January 13, 2005

PLSM, Inc. will be sending out the year's first mailing of the Dear Cain Plaintiffs letter to the class of Cain v. MDOC in the coming weeks.  Below are a few highlights.  Keep an eye on our Cain v. MDOC section for the full letter in PDF format.


PAROLE BOARD MEMBERS APPOINTED

Director Patricia L. Caruso announced the appointment of three new Parole Board members. Current Parole Board member Miguel Berrios was reappointed.

The new members are Artina Tinsley Hardman of Detroit, Enid Livingston of Birmingham and Stephen H. DeBoer of Hastings. The appointments begin 1/30/05 and go through 9/30/08. They replace William Slaughter, Margie McNutt and George Lellis. Their terms have expired.

Former Representative Artina Tinsley Hardman represented the Third House District. She served three terms and was chair of the Legislative Black Caucus for her three terms.

Enid Livingston is an attorney in private practice. She specializes in writing appellate briefs and arguing before the Michigan appellate courts as well as various Circuit Courts. She currently serves as a member for the State Bar’s Prisons and Corrections Section Council.

Stephen DeBoer has a law enforcement background. He is Barry County Sheriff and was a First Lieutenant in the Michigan State Police.

Chairman John Rubitschun, Rev. James Atterberry, Barbara Sampson, James Quinlan, Charles Braddock and Marianne Samper are the other Board members.


Appellate Assigned Counsel Standards Changed

The Supreme Court amended the performance standards for assigned appellate counsel, effective January 1, 2005. Administrative Order 2004-6. The court has reduced the 20 “MAACS” standards in Administrative Order 1981-7 down to 9. The new standards serve only as “guidelines.” Non-compliance with any of the standards, alone, is not a basis for a claim of ineffective assistance. Also, a violation of a standard will no longer be considered a violation of the Michigan Rules of Professional Conduct. Some of the other significant changes are summarized here.

New Standard 2 eliminates the requirement for a personal client visit by the attorney. At counsel’s discretion, the required consultation may be through an attorney agent, video or other means.

Standard 4 still allows defendants to file a pro per supplemental brief, but now it must be done within 84 days after counsel files appellant’s brief.
This deadline may be extended only on counsel’s motion establishing “good cause” for failure to meet the 84 day time limit.

New Standard 5 changes the requirement that counsel obtain defendant’s “written” consent to dismiss the appeal. Now, only “informed” consent is required.
 


Past News

July 14, 2004

In reaction to the recent shootings in the Detroit area, Governor Granholm announced that parolees found in possession of a firearm will be sent back to prison as parole violators and may be charged with a new crime as well.  Read more in the Detroit Free Press, here.

quotable:

"Barbara Levine, executive director of the Citizens Alliance on Prisons & Public Spending, said based on details of Granholm's plan relayed to her Tuesday, it could result in unfair penalties for some violators.

'We are very concerned about mandatory policies that require the imposition of extremely harsh penalties, regardless of individual circumstances,' Levine said. 'We are also concerned about policies that will further expand our already overburdened prison system at substantial cost to taxpayers, without any evidence it will actually reduce crime.' "

For more information on CAPPS and parole issues, visit their website: www.capps-mi.org

© 2004 Prison Legal Services of Michigan, Inc.